More indie games

War Fantasy points the shooter at the shooter

3 min read

Plenty of shooters have a level where the game asks whether you should have pulled the trigger. War Fantasy is built entirely out of that question, and it does not offer you the power fantasy back afterwards.

The genre is the subject

War Fantasy is a psychological horror first-person shooter about the merging of war video games and real warfare. The studio is direct about it: this will not pull punches or ignore the tragic cost of conflict, player actions have consequences, this is not a power fantasy, and there is no heroism here. There is only the next instruction.

That last line is the mechanic hiding inside the mission statement. Military shooters run on orders. You are told where to go and what to clear, and compliance is the only verb the level accepts. Framing that as horror does not require inventing anything — it requires removing the reward that normally covers it.

The boundary between simulation and reality collapsing is the horror premise, and it is also an accurate description of what a shooter is. You are always both the person holding a controller and the thing in the scope.

Why removal is the hard part

Morality in the mechanics is the whole test. A game that puts the moral weight in cutscenes has not done anything, because the player still had a good time in the part they played. The weight has to be in the shooting itself, or in what the shooting stops giving you.

Finding the fun in FPS campaigns is the tension on the other side. Campaigns are built on escalation, new toys and set pieces. Strip out heroism and you have removed the engine most shooters run on, and something has to take its load or the game is just unpleasant.

Dread is the usual answer and it is a demanding one. It needs pacing, silence and a sense that the next room is worse, which is much harder to author than a bigger gun.

What you actually get

War Fantasy is by Non-Euclidean, self-published, listed as To be announced on Windows, under Action and Indie. The store page reads more like a statement of intent than a feature list, which tells you where the studio thinks the value is.

That is a real risk and worth naming. A game that leads with its thesis has to be a good game as well as a correct argument, or it becomes something people agree with and do not play. The measure will be whether the shooting is well made enough that giving it up costs you something. A thesis you can put down is an essay; a thesis you keep playing is a game.

If the appeal is a shooter that refuses to make you comfortable, Undead Chronicles is the other one on this list — 1923 Istanbul, historical weapons with real weight, and one bite means permanent death.