More indie games

SAFE INSIDE makes the saferoom door the hardest thing in the game

4 min read

Co-op zombie games ask you to stay together and then never charge you for leaving. SAFE INSIDE puts the voice channel on a leash, and ends every stretch with a door that somebody has to decide when to close.

Proximity chat, and a door with a lock on it

You and your team are moving between saferooms while the infected try to stop you. The verbs are the familiar ones — run, shoot, revive, push through the next street — with one addition that quietly reorganises all of them. You talk over proximity chat, so your voice only reaches the teammates standing close enough to hear it.

That turns distance into a resource. In most co-op shooters the squad is a single organism however far apart it is, because everyone shares one channel and a plan can be called from anywhere on the map. Here, spreading out costs you the ability to coordinate at exactly the moment coordination is worth most. Straying too far does not only leave you exposed — it removes you from the conversation, and the rest of the group stops being able to plan around you.

The enemies are built to press on that. Most of the infected came out of the outbreak fast and aggressive, working by weight of numbers, which pushes a team into a tight mutually covering knot. The mutated ones are the counter-argument: they have grown past their original human shape into specific shapes, each with a trait that goes looking for a weakness and turns it against you. A horde punishes you for being scattered. A specialist punishes you for being predictable, and five people bunched in one corridor are extremely predictable.

Then there is the door. The campaigns are written to break the team up — events and decisions force you apart, so you finish a stretch alone or in twos, converging on the saferoom from different directions. Whoever arrives first gets a choice with no information attached to it: throw the lock now, or hold it open and wait. You cannot see who is still alive out there. Anyone left outside when the door closes is lost for good. That is the whole game compressed into a single input.

What that door is actually doing

How Overcooked’s kitchens force you to communicate makes the point that most co-op games manufacture teamwork by handing players different powers or different information, while Overcooked gives everyone identical tools and lets the room do the work. SAFE INSIDE runs the same trick through sound. Nobody is issued a special job, but the space decides who can hear whom, so the teamwork falls out of the geometry instead of being assigned in a menu.

Morality in the mechanics argues that karma meters flatten ethics, and that the sharpest moral design hides inside the combat, money and survival systems a player is already using. The saferoom door is a clean instance of it. There is no prompt asking what kind of survivor you are and no bar moving afterwards. There is a lock, a timer made of the noise outside, and three friends who might be thirty seconds away. Whatever you choose, you chose it with the same hands you have been reloading with.

What makes good AI is the piece that decides whether the rest of it holds. Its claim is that enemies feel smart when they are legible and consistent rather than genuinely clever — you have to be able to read a threat and know what it wants from you. If each mutated type is legible at a distance and from its sound, the team can make real decisions about when to split and when to regroup. If they are a grab bag of surprises, the proximity chat degrades into noise and the door becomes a coin flip.

What you actually get

SAFE INSIDE is by Broken Chair Studios, self-published, filed under Action, coming to Windows with no date announced yet. It lists single-player alongside online co-op and Family Sharing, and the campaigns run down the East Coast of the United States — snow-covered suburbs and eerie hospitals in New England at one end, the muggy overgrown marshes of the Carolinas at the other.

That single-player line is the part worth watching. A game whose best mechanic is other people’s voices has to decide what it becomes when there are no other voices in the room, and the forced splits and the locked door only carry weight if somebody real is on the other side of them. The setting choice helps here: a route with a direction to it gives a campaign structure a reason to keep separating people and putting them back together.

If the appeal is a multiplayer game where the talking is the mechanic rather than the plumbing around it, Speak is the other one on this list — private calls between real players, except there the reason to talk is to get somebody to trust you right before you sell them out.