More indie games

Hawthorn makes recruiting the villagers the build order

4 min read

Most settlement games hand you villagers as units with a work speed. Hawthorn makes talking them into staying the first move, and the people you convince are the village.

Recruiting is the construction

Woodland creatures built a trading post in Windermere Valley and then left it. What is there now is varmints, fairy lights and a set of rumours nobody wants to explain, and you are moving in anyway. You recruit villagers, farm, craft, build, explore the woods past the edge of the clearing, defend the place against the weather and against forest tricksters, and mark each season with the tradition that belongs to it. Solo, or in co-op with friends working alongside the NPCs.

The unusual part is where the labour goes. In most settlement builders the villagers are a consequence — you raise a housing number, bodies appear, and you assign them to a job queue. Hawthorn puts the persuasion first. The curious folk who come through the valley each arrive with a story of their own, and you get them by befriending them, which means the build order is social before it is structural. Every villager is a conversation you had, not a slot you filled.

That changes what a loss costs. A worker unit is replaceable by definition; a character you talked into moving here is not, and a village assembled one name at a time is a much harder thing to shrug at when the tricksters come through it. It also puts real weight on the writing, because the whole economy of the game runs on whether you want these particular animals around.

The phrase the developers keep using is an ever-changing world bigger than you, and the honest read of that is a sandbox that does not wait. Seasons turn, the forest moves, and your settlement is one thing happening in the valley rather than the only thing.

Worth knowing what is on Steam right now: a proof-of-concept demo, built at the start of development to show publishers the vision, now released publicly to collect feedback. It concentrates on the village-building half. The team says a great deal has been added since, and that the visuals in it are not the finished look.

Why the villagers have to be real

The Genius AI Behind The Sims is the reference that matters most here. Its argument is that the households of The Sims read as living people because of needs, scored options, carefully tuned curves — and a deliberate refusal to simulate everything. That last part is the useful one for a game promising memorable NPCs. Aliveness is not a budget you spend evenly; it is a small number of legible drives placed where the player is actually looking, and a lot of quiet nothing everywhere else.

Clockwork Games and Time Loops covers the other half of the promise. It argues that when a world runs on a schedule instead of holding still until you act, the decision of when you show up becomes a real one. That is the difference between seasons as a colour palette and seasons as a mechanic. If the harvest and the festival happen whether or not you are there, then a week spent deep in the woods has a price, and celebrating a tradition is something you chose over something else.

What’s the Point of Prototyping? is worth reading against the release itself. A prototype is a small, disposable build made to settle one uncertain question while being wrong is still cheap — not a rough draft of the finished game. Hawthorn has published its prototype rather than retiring it, which is a fair way to fund an independent team, and also a real risk: the build was made to answer one question about the village loop, and an audience will judge it as a demo of everything. Going in knowing which of the two you are playing makes it a much better time.

What you actually get

Hawthorn is by [NEARstudios](https://playhawthorn.com/), a team of former Bethesda, BioWare and Naughty Dog developers, and no publisher is attached yet — the store lists it as TBD, which lines up with the demo having been built to show publishers in the first place. It is coming soon on Windows, with the release date given as to be announced, filed under Action, Adventure, Indie, RPG and Simulation.

The multiplayer is broader than most games this size bother with: single-player, online co-op and LAN co-op, plus partial controller support. LAN in particular is not a box anyone ticks by accident, and it fits a game about a group of people sharing one place.

If the appeal is a cosy life sim that also has something dangerous in it, Monster Fantasy is the other one on this list with the same problem to solve — a peaceful half and a threatening half, where the design only works if the quiet side is genuinely playable on its own.